<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Catholic Exchange Forums Topic: latae sententiae</title>
<link>http://forums.catholicexchange.com/</link>
<description>Catholic Exchange Forums Topic: latae sententiae</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:57:44 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>fishman on "latae sententiae"</title>
<link>http://forums.catholicexchange.com/topic/838#post-13389</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>fishman</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13389@http://forums.catholicexchange.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;so what's new.  Go vatican. As it should be.  Of coarse they may eventually get in to trouble if some bishop turns out to have been excommuncated some years before it was discovered.  How does that affect the validity of sacraments the man does? anyone know?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Zachaeus on "latae sententiae"</title>
<link>http://forums.catholicexchange.com/topic/838#post-13386</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 09:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Zachaeus</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13386@http://forums.catholicexchange.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=58760&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=58760&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
