Catholic Exchange Forums » Faith and Life

The humane condemnation of homosexuality

(27 posts)

fishman - Member
i recently ran across a statement on the board which indicated that the speaker felt condemnation of homosexuality was inhumane. Given that homosexuality ( by this I mean actively having homosexual sex and am excluding the mere temptation to homosexual acts) is a mortal sin. Given that failure to recognize the sinfulness of this act and repent from it ( repentance meaning actively rejecting it as a moral evil) causes a person to burn eternally in hell. 

I hold that it is eminently disrespectful and an act of barbarity and inhumanity to NOT condemn homosexuality within and without the catholic church.

 

The question I have is how can we do this effectively and communicate the fullest extent of love and respect for the person and the sinner. Especially in this current environment where it is considered extremely discourteous and disrespectful to point out the flaws of another?

 How can we fully love homosexuals by fully condemning their actions and at the same time convey to them that our condemnation is out of legitimate concern the same that we would show for a prostitute , addict, murder or other person guilty of repeated mortal sin? 

 

 

Posted 1 year ago #
Tarheel - Member

Good question?  Didn't Pope JP II say we should express love for homosexuals but not thier life style and homosexual acts?

 

This may be a difficult question for a good many folks due to homophobia and other stereotypes.  Not real sure sure how I myself could address this.

Posted 1 year ago #
David T Garrison - Inactive

I believe one should start with the Church.

Below is a link to  CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH

LETTER TO THE BISHOPS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
ON THE PASTORAL CARE OF HOMOSEXUAL PERSONS

 

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19861001_homosexual-persons_en.html

Remember, the Sun is always shining!

Posted 1 year ago #
David T Garrison - Inactive

and this may prove helpful in understanding what one is dealing with:

 

World Youth Day: From Toronto to Cologne

Rome 10-13 April 2003

Fr. Tony Anatrella
Psychoanalyst, specialist in Social Psychiatry
 

The world of youth today: who are they and what do they seek?

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/laity/Colonia2005/rc_pc_laity_doc_20030805_p-anatrella-gmg_en.html

Remember, the Sun is always shining!

Posted 1 year ago #
yanastrovich - Inactive

fishman, When in direct contact with a homosexual it is important first to determine if the person has any religious beliefs and what they consist of. It is more important to see if you can help the person to state his or her own religious condemnation of the act, rather than you specifically condemning homosexuality in general. Most people will confess thier sin if you give them a chance in a quiet, confidential, secure environment. No one enjoys being ridiculed or looked down on. Almost always a homosexual will come out of the closet so to speak if you allow him or her, then when asked if they believe it[homosexuality] to be right or wrong, almost always they will say it is wrong themselves but that they cannot help themselves which is true, they do need someone to help them overcome sin, just as we all need the church to overcome sin.

I am making these statements to you from years of experience working with person with mental/emotional behavior disabilities [15 years] and especially homosexual urges.

In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen

Posted 1 year ago #

A small point ...  And I do not want it to derail this great thread.  Homosexuality is not the same as a the sin commited by a prostitute.  I would say that the person who goes to a prostitute (whoremonger) does a more intrinsically evil act than a prostitute.  This is because a whoremonger uses a prostitute for nothing to do with love or the potential for life.  There is no good that I can see in being a whoremonger.  Where as I can see that a prostitute is making a living and possibly could be supporting a family.  I can see no good in the act of using a prostitute on the other hand.

So, I say homosexuality, like adultry, is a sin akin a whoremonger.  This is not to say that the prostitute commits a good act or a non mortal act.  It is just confusion all the way around, having nothing to do with love or life during the most intimate act between humans.

By the way fishman, great start of this thread.  Very well put and directed!  I say again do not let me derail this thread.

GK - God is good!

Posted 1 year ago #

Love, life and sex builds a marriage.  All four are important and must be inseperable.  Marriage that has only two of those three is stunted, as is sex anywhere but in marriage where life is possible.

Contraception must be put on the table as an evil.  It must be seen as evil as adultery and homosexuality.  Otherwise, we have no leg to stand on when attempting to love the homosexual and hate the sin.  And if we have no leg to stand on here, then homosexuality where "love" is truly involved is at least as good as married contraceptive sex.

GK - God is good!

Posted 1 year ago #
yanastrovich - Inactive

GK, It is written in the old Testament, "It is better to spill your seed into the belly of a whore than on the ground"

Perhaps this means that it is better to visit a prostitute than to masterbate oneself or as it has been described by Father Hardin[regarding homosexuality] mutual masterbation.

Father Hardin says homosexuality is nothing more than mutual masterbation between members of the same sex.

As the old Testament is the same truth as the new Testament, then it is better to visit a prostitute than to engage in homosexual acts.

In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen

Posted 1 year ago #
yanastrovich - Inactive

GK, A fine priest once told me, "If you truly love someone, then you would not sin with that person"

To say that a homosexual relationship is loving contradicts the meaning of love. Using another person's body to masturbate your own is not loving, it is a sin as well as contraceptive sex in marriage, which is also mutual masturbation. When contraceptives are used the effect is the same as spilling one's seed upon the ground, which is not only a sin, it is an abomination.

In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen

Posted 1 year ago #

Yanastrovich,

Perfection is in Christ.  All else need His mercy.  Call all to Jesus.  Show them that only through Christ do we find love and truth.  We can fight over the degrees of sins and how we should stack up different sins.  But I think it is at least as important to love those who are not as easy to love.  And one way to do that is to remember that we are sinners and that sin keeps us from Jesus.  Any sin that gets in the way is in need of removal.  We are all sinners and that fact may help us to love the sinner who sins through homosexual acts.

Sin should not be the focus, even when helping bring a sinner back to God.  And if we are to bring a sinner back to God we need to understand that Christ would leave the 99 to get that one lost sheep.  We need to love sinners, because we too are sinners and yet Christ loves us and died for us.  Christ embraced the cross!  We run from the cross.  We justify our selves and allow sin to continue in ourselves because our sins don't seem as heinous as other people's sins.  And in that the devil suceeds and builds hate in us.  Thus, we focus on the sin and don't see the person beyond it.

Many priests and wise men have helped remind me that sins are evil and must be rooted out.  And I would not deny all the truth that they speak and you so rightfully remind us of.  Yes homosexual acts are sinful.  I agree.  Yet their sinfullness should not blind us to our own sinfulness and need for Christ's mercy.  Christ calls us all. 

Oh and please show me where "It is written in the old Testament, "It is better to spill your seed into the belly of a whore than on the ground""

I do not recall that verse.

In Christ's love,

GK - God is good!

Posted 1 year ago #
fishman - Member

GK and yanna - all very good comentary.

Some futher thoughts.

I did not compare a whoremonger and a homosexual. I compared a whore and a homosexual.  My resaon for doing so is because homosexuality appears to be an addictive sin so after a person becomes a homosexual it can be difficult to abandon thier lifestyle.  Likewise with a whore.  Still homosexuality is more disorderd then being a whore because it is greater perversion of the act of sexual intercorse. ( as scripture points out). 

 

but truely if a sin is mortal you are basically deciding of something only kills or kills quickly.  Either way death is at the door.

 

My question was more focus on ( not in private , but in the public form),

how do we communicate that homosexuality is wrong but it is wrong BECAUSE we love and respect the homosexual.

 

 

Posted 1 year ago #
yanastrovich - Inactive
GK, You do not need to preach to me. I worked with homosexuals for 15 years and made no enemies. Obviously you did not read my previous post. The humane treatment is to allow the homosexual to confess the sin himself and come to his own condemnation of the act. Neither you nor I are called to condemn anyone. If we know a homosexual, we are called to draw the sinner from the sin. If we do not make any effort in that direction, then we are also guilty of the same sin. In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen
Posted 1 year ago #

yana,

Sorry to sound like I am preaching.  I have not the skill or position to do so.  I agree with you that we are called to spread the gospel and help sinners find the Truth.  My intention is not to lessen the sin of homosexual acts.  What I failed to clearly communicate is a good answer to fishman's original question.

Any thoughts on my reflection on contraception?

 

fishman,

You ask "how do we communicate that homosexuality is wrong but it is wrong BECAUSE we love and respect the homosexual."  

I am wondering if clarifying that hetrosexual sins are as spiritually destructive as homosexual sins would help toward that end?

 

I agree with you whole heartedly that beynod the mortalness of a sin you are kind of just deciding if "something only kills or kills quickly."

 

 

As far as comparing the homosexual and the whore, I still contend that the person's intent and ultimate goal shows they are diffrent and that a whoremonger is much closer to a homosexual.  In fact a whore does not become a whore to please herself sexually.  She doesn't do this for free.  She doesn't pay money to do this.  Actually, she gets money from the whoremonger.  And I'd be willing to guess that she is rarely if ever sexually satisfied by a customer. 

The whoremonger is more like the homosexual in that he seeks out this sexual activity for the sake of the activity itself.  The end is the activity, not money or a living.  Or am I seeing this wrong?

GK - God is good!

Posted 1 year ago #
yanastrovich - Inactive

GK, The way to help a homosexual most lovingly is to help him or her make the confession of sin at thier own desirous moment. Most people will confess if you give them half a chance. They need a quiet, secure place with the full knowledge that thier confession will remain confidential.

It is very difficult to help someone unless they want to be helped and that means that the homosexual must want to quit or at least slow down.

Whores are in the same boat as homosexuals insofar as confession and the desire to quit or slow down. Isnt that the frame of mind we all need to approach the confessional?

No matter what the sin, it must be confessed in order to reach absolution. Homosexuals and whore need the confessional as much as you and I do.

In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen

Posted 1 year ago #
fishman - Member

GK -- i see how there is a reasonableness in what you are saying.

I suppose to understand the nature of both the whoremonger and the homosexual and the beastialist and the pedaphile one should start with the addict to masturbation. 

 

All sins have same touch stone , they offend the digity of the human being and the dignity and holiness of sexuality and sensuality

 

Posted 1 year ago #
yanastrovich - Inactive

fishman, Sin by it's very definition is perversion of the will of God. Homosexual sex is merely one perverse act outside of Sacramental marriage. Perversity can be accomplished through sin in every aspect of human existance and through any of the Sacraments. [there are seven: lust,greed,gluttony,pride etc]. That is why Christ said, "A perverse generation looks after a sign and none shall be given it save Jonah".

Any human interaction can be perverted, that is why occasionally we have perverse comments on this forum from everyone at some time or another. Perverse from graciousness and charitable love in Christ. That is why we all are suppose to be constantly reconciling although some on this forum imagine falsely that they are always gracious and charitably loving when in fact they speak perversity.

The only way for homosexuals and whore and CE forum exchange posters will be absolved of perversity is in the confessional.

In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen

Posted 1 year ago #

fishamn,

You cut to the quick when you tie it all together and say "the dignity of the human being and the dignity and holiness of sexuality and sensuality." 

Helping sinners should be our whole impetus in the Church.  But, we can't help but be repelled by the sin.  I fail to get beyond the sin all the time.  Heck my sins stop me even before I even think to reach out.  Pray for me.

GK - God is good!

Posted 1 year ago #
David T Garrison - Inactive

Fishman wrote: they offend the digity of the human being and the dignity and holiness of sexuality and sensuality

I agree. And these sins also turn our attention inward to self pleasure and self gratification, denying God's role in life and the conjugal act. Many ask the Church to stay out of their bedrooms but God is always present and these sins as well as contraception are an attempt to close the door on God.

As to the men or women who engage in prostitution for monetary gain, I believe the sin is obvious there. We should also remember that all that engage in such activities are not necessarily willing participants.

Either way, choice or force, prayer, a deeper understanding of what could drive one to such despair and confusion, and charity are the answers to how we should engage those who have fallen into these sins against God remembering that their consciences are probably formed to believe that what they are doing is either morally correct or lacking any other option.

Remember, the Sun is always shining!

Posted 1 year ago #
yanastrovich - Inactive

David, The answer is simple, infrequent use of the confessional leads people to despair and greater sin.

In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen

Posted 1 year ago #
noelfitz - Member

David

You wrote:

Either way, choice or force, prayer, a deeper understanding of what could drive one to such despair and confusion, and charity are the answers to how we should engage those who have fallen into these sins against God remembering that their consciences are probably formed to believe that what they are doing is either morally correct or lacking any other option.

This is sound, well said.

It is not for us to judge those who appear to be practicing homosexuals.

For a sin to be committed  the act must be grevious and committed with clear knowledge and full consent.

Catholics who believe in contraception, miss Mass on Sundays or are living together outside marriage may not be in a state of grace.  Those who are not in the above categories may also be in a state of mortal sin due to pride or other sins.

We are all sinners.  We all stand in need of God’s mercy.

We should not judge anyone, not even ourselves.

But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged by you or by any human court. I do not even judge myself (NRSV, 1 Cor 4:3.

 

God bless,


NoelFitz.
_________________________________________________
In necessariis, unitas; in dubiis, libertas; in omnibus, caritas.
_________________________________________________

Posted 1 year ago #
yanastrovich - Inactive

GK, The answer is simple, frequent use of the confessional helps anyone to remain in grace and refuse sin.

In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen

Posted 1 year ago #
Ignatian77 - Inactive
Just consider the quandry the Church is now in, thanks to its tricky teaching on homosexuality. It says that while homosexual acts are disordered and sinful, the homosexual himself can be in good standing with the Lord by practicing abstinence. This policy or element of doctrine opens the floodgates into the clergy for gays. Hence, the Catholic priesthood is chuckfull of homosexuals. What a nightmare. Homosexuality is officially disapproved of by Church doctrine, yet the Church is essentially led by gays. I find this dilemma self-imposed and utterly crazy. It has to be addressed more responsibly in the future, if the Church is to maintain any credibility on the issue of homosexuality in modern society.    
Posted 1 year ago #
yanastrovich - Inactive

Ignatian77, It is a mystery from Christ as he said, "Some have been born eunichs, some have been made eunichs by the world and some have made themselves eunichs for the sake of the Kingdom". Some people have no sexual drive at all while others are preferentially homo or heterosexual in drive. Drive is not a reason for condemnation. Drive leads many persons to wealth, possessions, fame, leadership and sadly to crime. Acting on the impulses of drive in our heart is the cause of sin. The devil uses our weakness to tempt us to sin. The priest with homosexual drive who does not act on these temptations is within the law of God and man, just as the priest with heterosexual drive who does not act on these temptations is within the law of God and man. It is not a sin to be tempted, it is a sin to act on the drive of the temptation. Everyone has a weakness that the devil will exploit if he can, even you and I if we are not careful.

In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen

Posted 1 year ago #
David T Garrison - Inactive

Ignatian, yu wrote,

  can be in good standing with the Lord by practicing abstinence.

I think the Church uses the word chastity, it means more than abstinence. I see no fault as this is meant for the laity.

You also wrote, This policy or element of doctrine opens the floodgates into the clergy for gays.

In this you have overlapped the teaching for those that are same sex addicted and those that would be priests. The Church has many documents and regualtions in regards to whom should become a priest. Homosexuality is a "deal breaker". Some bishops in the discernment of men may have "overlooked", or been deceived by, men who desire the priesthood, but the official stance of the Church remains.   

Remember, the Sun is always shining!

Posted 1 year ago #
bhokuto - Member
Fishy,

Here's a humane condemnation of this topic:  I'll let the St. Apostle Paul speak.

1 Corinthians

6:9. Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the kingdom of God? Do not err: Neither fornicators nor idolaters nor adulterers:
An nescitis quia iniqui regnum Dei non possidebunt nolite errare neque fornicarii neque idolis servientes neque adulteri

6:10. Nor the effeminate nor liers with mankind nor thieves nor covetous nor drunkards nor railers nor extortioners shall possess the kingdom of God.
Neque molles neque masculorum concubitores neque fures neque avari neque ebriosi neque maledici neque rapaces regnum Dei possidebunt



Peace

Posted 1 year ago #
bhokuto - Member
Fishy,

I got a bit carried away and well here's something for you to maybe start another thread if you feel so inspired:

1 Corinthians 2

2:7. But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, a wisdom which is hidden, which God ordained before the world, unto our glory:
Sed loquimur Dei sapientiam in mysterio quae abscondita est quam praedestinavit Deus ante saecula in gloriam nostram

2:8. Which none of the princes of this world knew. For if they had known it, they would never have crucified the Lord of glory.
Quam nemo principum huius saeculi cognovit si enim cognovissent numquam Dominum gloriae crucifixissent

2:9. But, as it is written: That eye hath not seen, nor ear heard: neither hath it entered into the heart of man, what things God hath prepared for them that love him.
Sed sicut scriptum est quod oculus non vidit nec auris audivit nec in cor hominis ascendit quae praeparavit Deus his qui diligunt illum

2:10. But to us God hath revealed them by his Spirit. For the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.
Nobis autem revelavit Deus per Spiritum suum Spiritus enim omnia scrutatur etiam profunda Dei

2:11. For what man knoweth the things of a man, but the spirit of a man that is in him? So the things also that are of God, no man knoweth, but the Spirit of God.
Quis enim scit hominum quae sint hominis nisi spiritus hominis qui in ipso est ita et quae Dei sunt nemo cognovit nisi Spiritus Dei

2:12. Now, we have received not the spirit of this world, but the Spirit that is of God: that we may know the things that are given us from God.
Nos autem non spiritum mundi accepimus sed Spiritum qui ex Deo est ut sciamus quae a Deo donata sunt nobis

Peace

Posted 1 year ago #
yanastrovich - Inactive
Ignatian77, I would recommend that you read the report from the John Jay college of law regarding homosexuality in the church. The report is saying that homosexuality is not the leading cause of abuse: High-rate Abusers: (the 10+ and 20+ groups) – defined by counts of reported and

possible victims. These groups count 152 and 39 priests, respectively.

Pedophiles:26 Priests with two or more reported victims, either male or female,

but none over age 10 at time incident began. This grouping counts 96 individual

priests. It is hypothesized that pedophiles are aroused by the physical form of a

child, irrespective of the child’s gender.

Ephebophiles: Priests with two or more reported male victims, but all at least age

13 at the time of the start of the incident. This grouping counts 474 priests. It has

been suggested that ephebophiles are distinct from pedophiles because they are

aroused by the bodies of boys who have developed secondary sexual

characteristics.

Unusual acts group: The Victim Surveys recorded descriptions of unusual orexceptional behaviors and paraphilias27 for a small number of priests. This

grouping counts 143 priests.

You may read the entire report at www.usccb.org/ocyp/JohnJayReport.pdf

 

In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen
Posted 1 year ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.

Donate

Welcome to our redesigned site. Your continued support will make further improvements possible. Please click here to donate.

CE Spotlight

Faith Factory

Champions of Faith Ad

Radio & Podcasts


Rock Solid with Mark Shea: April 14, 2008 - Confirmation: Piety and Knowledge