I have watched news reports of Father Suarez on Philippine TV. he does have a large following. And from I gather form the news reports a great deal of what he is doing is without support from local bishops. I have seen priests and protestant clergy develop a large following in the Philippines as their so-called ability to heal provides a great deal of hope to a country that doesn't have health care available to a great deal of the population.
So I would say the Bishop is correct in wanting to ban him form conducting these healing masses. And if he was so successful in healing people don't you think the Vatican would be interested? has there been any verification of diseases or ailments cured during these masses?
As far as believing an article form the Philippine Inquirer, only with a grain of salt. That paper has definite communist tendencies and it has always been more than willing to report anything bad about the Church or an instance when a Catholic priest is doing good but is not performing in accordance with the local bishop.
Tarheel (Dave)
I do find it suspicious that if a man is doing such good, he is also incapable of obedience - even if those he is in obedience to are wrong. To me, lack of obedience is a clear sign that something is not right.
i'm not talking about human authority.
I agree with lpioch but as I read this this morning what "Authority" told St Peter, St John, and St James to stop?
As an added point to this priest in the Philippines. There was a Protestant pastor a few years that was proclaimed as a "healer". Does anyone hear of him now?
And I still think if this priest was in fact healing people the Vatican would be investigating and verifying these "miracles". I have noticed that you didn't compare this priest with Padre Pio. Didn't he choose to stay out of the "lime light"?
Tarheel (Dave)
“Do nothing apart from the bishop,” to the Philadelphians (7:2); "You should all follow the bishop as Jesus Christ did the Father .... Nobody must do anything that has to do with the Church without the bishop's approval," to the Smyrnaeans (8:1); “…[O]bey the bishop as if he were Jesus Christ," to the Trallians (2:2,1).You seem to be saying that the bishops who are preventing Father Suarez from working in their sees are not doing as Christ commanded. Perhaps it is the other way around and the bishops that are allowing him are failing Christ and their flock. You are calling for discernment but you have no proof that these shepherds aren’t exercising discernment in forbidding Fr. Suarez. In Christ, Michael
"The Catholic Church’s Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith requires a local bishop’s permission for Church-related activities conducted by those who do not belong to the diocese. Suarez is a member of the Canada-based religious congregation called Companions of the Cross."This is not a matter of discernment for the bishops, it is a matter of obedience for Father, regardless of the ostensible power to heal. In Christ, Michael
You are right, Michael. The bishop is the absolute ruler of his diocese. He and he alone decides who can preach in his diocese and who cannot; what can be read and what cannot; what can be taught and what cannot, etc. He answers to the Pope and only to the Pope.
Peace
Late one night in the middle of the day, Two dead boys got up to play, Back to back they faced one another, Then drew their swords and shot each other, One was blind and the other couldn't see So they chose a dummy for a referee. A blind man went to see fair play, A dumb man went to shout "hooray!" A paralysed donkey passing by, Kicked the blind man in the eye, Knocked him through a nine inch wall, Into a dry ditch and drowned them all, A deaf policeman heard the noise, And came to arrest the two dead boys, If you don't believe this story’s true, Ask the blind man he saw it too!You have yet to show that the bishops erred in their decision to keep Fr. Suarez from working in their dioceses. In Christ, Michael
bhokuto, Christ built the Catholic church on the rock of Peter because God knows the human need for authoritative leadership for the preservation of authentic faith. The priest in question may very well act in the name of the Holy Spirit however the Holy Spirit will never lead any person to defiance toward legitimate authority. In fact one of the observations made in the case of canonization of Saints is obedience to legitimate authority. All the Priest needs to do is get permission from the Bishop in all cases no matter what parish he is visiting. The fact that one Bishop approves and another does not is insignificant when considering a faithful Priests defiance toward his Bishop. As it is written in the OT Scriptures, Is it my ways that are unjust or is it your ways that are unjust my people of Israel? For when a wicked man turns toward righteousness, his sins are forgotten, however when a just man turns toward wickedness, then all his good deeds are forgotten.
This Priest's good deeds are all forgotten when he defies the approval of his Bishop, even if his deeds are approved elsewhere.
Whose way is fair bhokuto?
In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen
You must log in to post.