Catholic Exchange Forums » Faith and Life

Tabernacles....location, location, location

(61 posts)

1 2 3
Ray II - Inactive

Just a rambling purge and whatever feedback it solicits:

 

One thing that drives me nuts about our parish, the tabernacle is not located in the church proper. There is a small chapel directly opposite the main church space, both are off of the vestibule/narthex/whatever it's called, and this is where the tabernacle is located. I'm sure this is well in line with whatever documents govern church layouts, as our pastor as well as our diocese are, for the most part, fluff free. However, every time I go to church, I go to geneuflect before entering a pew, but then I remember I'm supposed to bow to the altar. I always wonder "Why did they set it up this way?"

 

Anyone have any idea on why a church would be set up so? I know every military chapel I went to had this set up, but you had to accomodate several different faiths every weekend, so you needed a neutral space, so to speak. I just can't figure out the reason for keep Jesus in the other room. For me, it must be that Catholic school upbringing, as soon as you entered the church, God was right there in front of you, physically. Quite a different emotion than what I experience now.

 

Anyway, I always forget to bring this up, so now I remembered. Any thoughts?

Posted 11 months ago #
michaelme - Member
Ray: I hate going into a new church and playing "Where's Jesus." I think that you'll find that the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM) is probably where you will find the "Why."
The Place for the Reservation of the Most Holy Eucharist 314. In accordance with the structure of each church and legitimate local customs, the Most Blessed Sacrament should be reserved in a tabernacle in a part of the church that is truly noble, prominent, readily visible, beautifully decorated, and suitable for prayer. The one tabernacle should be immovable, be made of solid and inviolable material that is not transparent, and be locked in such a way that the danger of profanation is prevented to the greatest extent possible. Moreover, it is appropriate that, before it is put into liturgical use, it be blessed according to the rite described in the Roman Ritual. 315. It is more in keeping with the meaning of the sign that the tabernacle in which the Most Holy Eucharist is reserved not be on an altar on which Mass is celebrated. Consequently, it is preferable that the tabernacle be located, according to the judgment of the Diocesan Bishop, a. Either in the sanctuary, apart from the altar of celebration, in a form and place more appropriate, not excluding on an old altar no longer used for celebration (cf. above, no. 303); b. Or even in some chapel suitable for the faithful's private adoration and prayer and which is organically connected to the church and readily visible to the Christian faithful. 316. In accordance with traditional custom, near the tabernacle a special lamp, fueled by oil or wax, should be kept alight to indicate and honor the presence of Christ. [emphasis mine]
In Christ, Michael
"The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried"
- GK Chesterton "The poets have been mysteriously silent on the subject of cheese." - also GKC
Posted 11 months ago #
Winslow - Inactive

That's a new one on me, Michael.  What does "...in keeping with the meaning of the sign..." mean? 

Tabernacles have traditionally been in the center of the high altar, where it is in my parish church (built in 1908, 100th anniversary this spring).

The only reason I can think of for reposing the Sacrament in an out of the way place is, so few people bother to genuflect when it's at the high altar.  Removing it prevents disrespect to Our Lord.

 

Peace

Posted 11 months ago #
michaelme - Member
Winslow: I'm just the messanger and certainly no canonist or liturgist. It's a good question. I personally like "organically connected." Here's a link to the GIRM in its entirety. The section quoted above is from Chapter V. Anecdotally, I have heard that there was some confusion about how this section was to be read and that there will be clarification on the matter. I've nothing concrete, however, so we'll probably be playing "Where's Jesus" for a few years to come. In Christ, Michael
"The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried"
- GK Chesterton "The poets have been mysteriously silent on the subject of cheese." - also GKC
Posted 11 months ago #
lpioch - Moderator

Ray II,

As you can read in the GIRM, there is some vagueness that some have chosen to run crazy with. 

I can say that I have seen this done quite well.  I have seen a (modern...therefore, not rectangular in shape) church where the tabernacle is basically IN the wall to the right of the church.  It is surrounded by glass.  So it is still visible to you when you enter the church, but it isn't front-and-center...it is to your right.  So if you're new, you still have the "where's Jesus" question until you see the red candle.  BUT...behind the glass and the tabernacle, just as beautifully done, is a prayer chapel (separate entrance from that of the church).  So people can come in anytime and pray to the tabernacle without entering the church.  I guess that would be "organically connected.

 

Bottom line?  If the GIRM is vague in any place, it has been taken advantage of, and I have no explanation of why. 

Posted 11 months ago #
noelfitz - Member

This is an interesting discussion

Michaelme has clearly pointed out that the positioning of the tabernacle is in accord with the Church's wishes.

I imagine  the principal reason is to give a place where one can reverently pray before the Blessed Sacrament.

God bless,


NoelFitz.
_________________________________________________
In necessariis, unitas; in dubiis, libertas; in omnibus, caritas.
_________________________________________________

Posted 11 months ago #
michaelme - Member
Winslow: I found this on the Catholic Answers site:
Q: In pre-Vatican II church architecture, tabernacles often were built into the altar. Now, as stated in the 2002 General Instruction of the Roman Missal, the norm is for the tabernacle not to be on an altar on which Mass is celebrated. Why? A: The relevant passage from the GIRM says this: "It is more in keeping with the meaning of the sign that the tabernacle in which the Most Holy Eucharist is reserved not be on an altar on which Mass is celebrated" (315). The reason for this change is to emphasize the change of the bread and the wine into the body and blood of Christ that takes place during the Consecration (or, to put it in more traditional terms, to spotlight the "miracle of the Mass"). The reasoning is that if the reserved Blessed Sacrament is kept in a tabernacle on the altar then Jesus is always present on the altar, and the Eucharistic change is not nearly as significant to the congregation as it is when Jesus becomes present on an altar on which he had not been present previously. The miracle that occurs is still awesome under both conditions, but it is better highlighted with the reform of tabernacle placement. Notice that there is no requirement to remove the tabernacle completely from the church but only to create a separation from the altar of sacrifice.
In Christ, Michael
"The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried"
- GK Chesterton "The poets have been mysteriously silent on the subject of cheese." - also GKC
Posted 11 months ago #
Winslow - Inactive

Thanks, Michael.  That clears it up.  The key phrase is that the Eucharist "not be on an altar on which Mass is celebrated."

With the 'altar' now an island table in the middle of the Sanctuary, I doubt there are any churches in the USA, or anywhere, for that matter, where the Tabernacle is "on an altar on which Mass is celebrated."  SSPX excluded.  In older churches the Tabernacle is on the high altar, which is a relic of the old days, and not on an altar on which Mass is celebrated.  Therefore, there is no canonical reason to put it to the side or outside or anywhere but where it's most appropriate to repose the Lord; in the middle of the Sanctuary as the "source and summit" of our Faith.

As the Tridentine Rite gains traction, something will have to change.

All that said, I think the reason they give is lame and unpersuasive.  Having the Sacrament reposed in a tabernacle, behind a closed door, is no distraction from the Consecration.  It didn't bother anyone for many centuries and I don't see why it's been made a bother now.

Thanks again.

 

Peace

 

Posted 11 months ago #
michaelme - Member
"Having the Sacrament reposed in a tabernacle, behind a closed door, is no distraction from the Consecration. It didn't bother anyone for many centuries and I don't see why it's been made a bother now." In ad orientem that's true. It would be more difficult, logistically, to have the priest celebrating from behind the tabernacle if it is placed on the altar. And speaking of ad orientem, there are still a few churches that celebrate the Novus Ordo this way - it seems that these must have to receive a dispensation from GIRM 315 since the tabernacle is on the same altar as the consecration. In Christ, Michael
"The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried"
- GK Chesterton "The poets have been mysteriously silent on the subject of cheese." - also GKC
Posted 11 months ago #
JosephMary - Moderator

Ave Maria!

 

I am totally with you on how distressing it is to walk into a modern church and wonder wehre the tabernacle is. I have personally had it happen that I asked someone who did not know!

My parish has a glass tabernacle off to the side and the most commonly used entrance goes past it and only a h andful of people ever acknowledge it muchless genuflect. But then we never ever hear a homily on the Eucharist and what adoration we have is dying. Sad to say, that the priest, deacon or sisters never participate.

Posted 11 months ago #
Winslow - Inactive

As I said, Michael, it's never been a problem with the Novus Ordo and it isn't now.  I'd guess those practicing the Novus Ordo are simply ignoring GIRM 315.  Most priests ignore the General Instructions anyway.  Half of them couldn't say a proper Mass if their life depended on it.

 

Peace

Posted 11 months ago #
michaelme - Member
JosephMary Did you mean that the tabernacle is glass or that the chapel is set off by a glass partition? If the actual tabernacle is glass, that is a GIRM violation (see above). Winslow Sorry, I must have misunderstood you. I thought you were suggesting that the tabernacle should be placed on the altar of sacrifice when you said "lame and unpursuasive." I see, now, that you must have been referring to the tabernacle's absence from the church-proper entierly. I agree. Why not have it placed very visibly on the rear altar (the altar of repose)? In Christ, Michael
"The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried"
- GK Chesterton "The poets have been mysteriously silent on the subject of cheese." - also GKC
Posted 11 months ago #
Ray II - Inactive

Thanks for all the responses, especially the link to the GIRM. By no means am I trying to troubleshoot the parish or the canonical guidance for it, I was just always curious. As a nerd, it's always nice for me to see documents as well.

It does make me nostalgic for the high altar (and yes, there are still plenty of them out there) but maybe that's the reason this bothers me and it could be that there is a calling for those of us who are bothered by this issue. Lots of Catholics, especially younger ones, know nothing about "how it was when I was a kid" and maybe, and I don't know how, we are supposed to be finding a way for them to feel that connection, that moment, that understanding and awe when you walk into God's presence, knowing that when you walk in to that large church, even though you may be the only one there, it is filled with Him and you need to take up as little room as possible because you are not as important or "big" as you think. You are as important as He thinks, and that's a whole different important than we can grasp. It puts us in our place, not to belittle us, but to remind us that we are all important to Him, that even the smallest role in His plan is larger and of greater significance than we can imagine. And more than likely, it has to do with the fact that there is a frailty to our minds and hearts that is helped by "seeing" Him right there, in the tabernacle, allowing us to be with Him. Doubting Thomas and all that.

Or I could just be rambling all over the place in run-on sentences, which are highly underrated as a literary device for the grammatically challenged, I might add.

Either way, thanks again for the info and keep the faith!

Ray

Posted 11 months ago #
Winslow - Inactive

Great run-on sentences, Ray.  My church is like the one you describe and the feelings of awe you recall are present to me every time I enter the nave.

Reading your post reminded me of the closing of a Catholic church not far from mine.  Downsizing in the Archdiocese of Boston.  The church was built in the 70s.  It was round with the pews set in a semi-circle of about 150 degrees.  There was no high altar and the Tabernacle was placed to the side.  The celebrant took his seat where the Tabernacle should have been.  The best thing about the place was the altar crucifix, which was almost life size and hung over the altar.  The nails were driven through Jesus' wrists, as in the Shroud of Turin.  I think it was donated to a church in the Dominican Republic the parishioners sponsered.

That church wasn't half as old as mine and now it's gone.  Jehovah's Witnesses bought it.  Maybe God's telling us something.

 

Peace

Posted 11 months ago #
AlvinaL - Inactive

The United States Council of Catholic Bishops issued a document: Built of Living Stones: Art, Architecture and Worship and includes The Location of the Tabernacle paragraphs 74, 75, and 76.

http://www.usccb.org/liturgy/livingstones.shtml#chapteronec

It’s frustrating when GPS is necessary to locate the tabernacle in a Catholic Church.
Posted 11 months ago #
yanastrovich - Inactive

Ray, It is not the orientation of the altar that is disturbing, it is your orientation toward Christ. Where-ever Christ is, that is how you should be oriented. It is far better to make certain that you face Christ rather than you face the altar. If facing Christ means that you need to re-orient your position toward him then that is what is important in how things are situated. If Christ is in the side altar, then sit in the side altar and forget about where everyone else is. Imagine that Christ is present in the body that was crucified, would you want to sit near him or would you want to sit facing the altar? Everyone knows that when we meet Christ face to face, we are going to be facing him, not his altar.

In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen

Posted 10 months ago #
Zachaeus - Member

Where's Jesus?... Where's Jesus?? What an odd question indeed!

I would suggest that you look for Jesus in your neighbor to your left, your neighbor to your right, your neigbor in front of you and in your neighbor who sits behind you. But most important, in my opinion, is to look to the temple of your heart, a place that is with you at all times, to find Jesus. Don't look for Jesus in some man inspired vessel lest it bring you to idolatry. Old testament worship is a false need to put a golden idol before your eyes; so that your eyes can behold what your heart cannot.

Sorry folks, I can't agree with you on this one.  

Posted 10 months ago #
Winslow - Inactive

I don't know what your "man inspired vessel" refers to, Zach, but I'm a Catholic and I look for, and find, Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament.

 

Peace

Posted 10 months ago #
Zachaeus - Member

“Man inspired vessel” simple refers to any man made artifact used to hold the Blessed Sacrament upon the completion of the Mass such as: a pyx (usually of gold or silver), used to transport a consecrated Host; a tabernacle (usually of gold or silver) which is believed to be a place of repose for consecrated Hosts (as if repose is possible for Christ!), and a monstrance which is a vessel (usually of gold or silver) in which the consecrated Host is exposed for adoration. All of which, except maybe the pyx, to my mind and conscience are a from of idolatry, false worship, an attempt to put God in a material object so that worship is easier, more comfortable, so the eye can behold what the heart struggles with. Blessed are those that have not seen yet believe.  

Did Jesus set the example of keeping the bread and wine that He Himself consecrated at the last supper to be saved somewhere for later consumption? For religious display? To be adored and worshipped outside the heart? I think not. Yet in our religious fervor to praise God with all our mind, soul and strength we have materially constructed and hammered the same golden vessels to repeat the sin Aaron!

 Hope this clears it up.
Posted 10 months ago #
yanastrovich - Inactive

 

zachaeus, You are incorrect about the man inspired vessel, it contains the Body of Christ. If you do not believe that then please be so kind as to admit it to us.In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen

Posted 10 months ago #
Zachaeus - Member
I always assent to true, authentic Catholic teaching... period. Assent is a choice that I make whether or not my intellect supports or betrays me. That is merely my satanic—read fleshly—nature. Clear enough?
Posted 10 months ago #
Ray II - Inactive
Zachaeus, I agree whole heartedly with you on looking to my neighbors and myself to find Christ. I don't remember which saint it was, but I remember the story of a priest who bowed to everyone he met, no matter how "lowly" their station or criminal their lifestyle. When asked why he did it, he said he was bowing to the Christ in them. That kind of stuck with me I suppose. The point I was trying to make is that when entering the church, if the tabernacle is elsewhere, the focus is elsewhere. I also agree that some of us can be caught up in a form of idolatry by hanging on to either the material trappings of Tradition harder than why they are a part of Tradition, or to the law, code, etc. versus living the law, almost like Pharisees. However, some of your post I disagree with. "a monstrance which is a vessel (usually of gold or silver) in which the consecrated Host is exposed for adoration" So we adore the Host, not the monstrance. Idolatry how? I also believe God told the intinerant Jewish folks to build the ark and the temple around it, didn't he? God didn't think that was idolatry, He used it as a dwelling place among his people. How do you make the leap?
Posted 10 months ago #
Zachaeus - Member

A while back we (michaelme, lpioch, pasque and others) were discussing the "Real Presence" where it was revealed during the coarse of the discussion that it was Church understanding and maybe even Church teaching that the Real Presence leaves the host upon entering the stomach. It leaves the person. I found this revelation quite shocking and deeply disturbing. But the issue was raised. How long does the Real Presence of Christ remain in the host after consecration but not consumed? Did Christ intend us to consume His body and blood or did He intend to have His True Essence entombed in the element of bread to be put on public display. Did He intend external adoration of the consecrated bread? I think not. I would suggest that His presence leaves the host the moment it fails to be consumed or when there is no intention of a reasonable time before consumption. To my mind this renders the placement of the Tabernacle as moot. It has become an unnecessary artifact from the ancient Church that may have led a lot of pious, well intentioned followers of Christ to engage in idolatrous behaviour. Perhaps this is why Church officials move the Tabernacle out of sight when ever possible

.  

Posted 10 months ago #
Ray II - Inactive

The Real Presence leaving the Eucharist at the moment of reception was actually Luther. As for when He leaves it, that is up to Him I would suppose. We will know because the bread will take back it's natural properties and evetnaully mold. For some heavy lifting on the reading and comprehension side of the net, try this link. This took me quite a while to read through, but is very informative.

 

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05573a.htm#3

 

To answer the reason for the adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, this is what I find in the New Advent link:

 

"The Adorableness of the Eucharist is the practical consequence of its permanence. According to a well known principle of Christology, the same worship of latria (cultus latriæ) as is due to the Triune God is due also to the Divine Word, the God-man Christ, and in fact, by reason of the hypostatic union, to the Humanity of Christ and its individual component parts, as, e.g., His Sacred Heart. Now, identically the same Lord Christ is truly present in the Eucharist as is present in heaven; consequently He is to be adored in the Blessed Sacrament, and just so long as He remains present under the appearances of bread and wine, namely, from the moment of Transubstantiation to the moment in which the species are decomposed (cf. Council of Trent, Sess. XIII, can. vi)."

 

 

Posted 10 months ago #
Zachaeus - Member
Thanks Ray, I appreciate the links. They will become this evenings read. God Bless.
Posted 10 months ago #
lpioch - Moderator

Just for clarification, the discussion some time ago was regarding the Real Presence in the host and the consecrated wine (now the body and blood).  The presence of Christ remains as long as the appearances of bread and wine are still discernable.  (another way to put it I see above from the new advent link:  "to the moment in which the species are decomposed") 

Once the Eucharist is consumed, we do not know EXACTLY how long it takes for this to take place, but it is the common practice to have 15 minutes of prayer after reception of communion because of this.  It is not upon immediate consumption...but it is upon the indiscernability (is that a word?) of the species...or as the quote above says...the decomposition.

However, we also discussed a long time ago, the fact that the reception of the Eucharist unites us to Christ and to the body of Christ in a true communion.  You are what you eat.  He does not lower himself to us...but He elevates us to Him. 

So the final conclusion really is...it doesn't matter quite so much how long the Eucharist remains the Eucharist at a molecular level.  What matters is what we receive and put into action from it.

As for reserving the host, there are strict rules that must be followed as to how long the hosts are to be kept in reserve before being consumed.  Once fermentation is possible, the host must be consumed.

This remains consistent with the assertion that the Real Presence remains as long as the species are not decomposed (or can be discerned as the species).

Posted 10 months ago #
Winslow - Inactive

<<All of which, except maybe the pyx, to my mind and conscience are a from of idolatry, false worship>>>

 

Zacheus, you say you conform to Church teaching, but your conclusion as quoted above is heresy.  Catholics do not worship the chalice or the pyx or the monstrance and you should know that.

As to whether Jesus intended that the unconsumed Sacrament be reposed, there is nothing in Scripture about that.  Hence the Church, as she has with much of doctrine and dogma, has had to rely on the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.  So the conclusion can be drawn, since it the practice of the Church, Jesus does so intend it.

Peace

Posted 10 months ago #
Zachaeus - Member

Tabernacles…location…location…location. If I walk into a Church and genuflect, kneel or sit before the Tabernacle as a form of worship and adoration… exactly what am I doing? Offering reverence and adoration to Jesus? What if the Tabernacle is empty? Now what have I done?

The articles that Ray cites identify the notion of “preserved presence”. It also said the practice began in the 13th or 14th centuries—which by the way was not a glorious time for the Church.  

Winslow, do not fear heresy, Jesus came to save the heretic as well.  As you said scripture is silent on the issue of “Permanence of Presence”. If the teaching of decomposition is valid then perhaps the Host could be laminated between plastic sheets and hung around the necks of the faithful, then we could actually walk around in our daily lives with the body, blood, soul and divinity of Christ very close to our hearts. But we don’t, because it is absurd. Thus the actual length of time of “Permanence of Presence” needs careful discernment and thoughtfulness. This novel practice of Tridentine times may be simply nothing more than a knee jerk reaction to our brothers of the reformation: “We have the Bread of Life and you don’t, na…na…na...na....poo.poo”

Posted 10 months ago #
Winslow - Inactive

First, please don't lecture me, Zacheus.  I don't need it and, frankly, I resent it.

And if you walk into a Catholic church and don't  genuflect or kneel and the Blessed Sacrament is present in the tabernacle, you are showing disrespect for the person of Jesus Christ.  (BTW, your capitalizing 'tablernacle' is idolatry.  You're worshiping a word.  That's about the level of this debate.)

 

Jesus may have come to save the heretic, but if the heretic persists in his heresy, the Church Jesus formed will invite him out.  I don't fear heresy.  I just identify it in the hope the heretic will reform himself and allow himself to be saved.

If we're going to discuss 'preserved presence' which none of us are qualified to do unless we're theologians, we may as well go on to how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

Peace

Posted 10 months ago #
Protect the Rock - Moderator

I believe the purpose of the red lamp next to the tabernacle is to indicate that Jesus is present.  If the tabernacle is empty, then the lamp is not lit.

Posted 10 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.

Donate

Welcome to our redesigned site. Your continued support will make further improvements possible. Please click here to donate.

CE Spotlight

Faith Factory

Champions of Faith Ad

Radio & Podcasts


Rock Solid with Mark Shea: April 14, 2008 - Confirmation: Piety and Knowledge