Catholic Exchange Forums » Faith and Life

That Which is Veiled

(3 posts)
  • Started 1 year ago by work in progress
  • Latest reply from work in progress

work in progress - Inactive

After some research, prompted by my curiosity about the few women who wear a veil during mass or in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament, I am miffed by how this practice has been lost. If we are to take our cues from Canon Law and scripture,  

  • 1 Corinthians 11:1-17:
    Be ye followers of me, as I also am of Christ. Now I praise you, brethren, that in all things you are mindful of me and keep my ordinances as I have delivered them to you. But I would have you know that the head of every man is Christ: and the head of the woman is the man: and the head of Christ is God. Every man praying or prophesying with his head covered disgraceth his head. But every woman praying or prophesying with her head not covered disgraceth her head: for it is all one as if she were shaven. For if a woman be not covered, let her be shorn. But if it be a shame to a woman to be shorn or made bald, let her cover her head. The man indeed ought not to cover his head: because he is the image and glory of God. But the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man [c.f. Genesis 2-3]. For the man was not created for the woman: but the woman for the man. Therefore ought the woman to have a power over her head, because of the angels. But yet neither is the man without the woman, nor the woman without the man, in the Lord. For as the woman is of the man, so also is the man by the woman: but all things of God. You yourselves judge. Doth it become a woman to pray unto God uncovered? Doth not even nature itself teach you that a man indeed, if he nourish his hair, it is a shame unto him? But if a woman nourish her hair, it is a glory to her; for her hair is given to her for a covering. But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, nor the Church of God [i.e., if anyone want to complain about this, we have no other way of doing things, this is our practice; all the churches believe the same way]. Now this I ordain: not praising you, that you come together, not for the better, but for the worse.

Then should we not question the wisdom of rejecting the veil? As I understand it, veiling was required by Canon Law before Vatican II. The topic was not discussed during Vatican II, and after that, the changes to Canon Law didn't explicitly revoke the requirement. Therefore, according to Canon Law and over 2000 years of custom, are we not still required to veil ourselves? 

I'm thinking it is time to buy a mantilla.

Posted 1 year ago #
dado - Member

The Churches interpretation of this is that it was a discipline enacted for a spiritual benefit, much like not eating meat on Friday (which by the way is still in force but is modified so that you may do another act of penance or charity in place of abstaining from meat).

From Catholic answers: "There is no canon in the 1983 Code that parallels this older requirement. Since the 1983 Code expressly abrogates (i.e., abolishes, annuls) the 1917 Code (cf. canon 6, Code of Canon Law [1983]), women are no longer required to wear head coverings in church or at Mass."

 Dado

AMDG

Posted 1 year ago #
work in progress - Inactive

Following your comment, I searched a little further in the Canon Law section of this site. Voila! The topic is here, and is addressed very well, and includes a direct response to the confusing information I had found.

I might still get one, but I'll reflect on it further.

WIP

Posted 1 year ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.

Donate

Welcome to our redesigned site. Your continued support will make further improvements possible. Please click here to donate.

CE Spotlight

Faith Factory

Champions of Faith Ad

Radio & Podcasts


Rock Solid with Mark Shea: April 14, 2008 - Confirmation: Piety and Knowledge