In my email . . . On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 20:03:36 EST, a fellow roundtable member wrote:
Dear Pristinus,
I would like to suggest that you cool the "...God's first" portion of your handle.
It is a noble attachment and quite creative but since you answer so many of the articles and comments in the Catholic Exchange, it is becoming boorish and laden with overkill.
You have much to offer and are of particular interest. Dropping that portion of your handle will effectively add to your excellent contributions.
I look forward to your continuing presence on CE.
(Try, any, to chase me off! And, to which I responded . . .)
Dear Sir,
Thank you for appreciating my presence at the roundtable. It is a rare person around here whom I do not find welcome to read their posts. So many so often are illuminating.
I have to wonder how my remembrance of a worthy spiritual and intellectual martyr - and example and hero of mine - could 'overkill' anything at a Catholic site? Saint Thomas More, a devoted family man as well as loyal and effective king's officer, reflected what we must keep in front of us at all times - no matter who else claims our attention, care, service, etc., God has prime claim at all times.
As 'noble and creative' as it is - it is me, about me, for me, and gives any reader a glimpse into me as does my nickname of Pristinus Sapienter. It is, after a fashion, a means of giving tête-à-tête to what is far from intimate conversation, as such internet things go. Likely as not, on the roundtable, considering all, I might not even be able tell if you are a man or woman, mightn't I? Only as you have fully signed your message can I know you as [his given name]. (Yet, of a fact, it is your right to tell me that your sex and even actual name are not my business, eh?) Then again, of my nickname, of Latin masculine suffix, I do give away that I am a man; my avatar, also, unless I am a bald, bearded lady(!) Indeed, I think that all about my postings, even in the canned signature, calls for just such response as you have made, beyond the topics and subjects of exchanges.
You find it boorish, and I am certain others find me boorish (and worse) in other ways. In fact, as it is your clear right to find things about me boorish and tell me so, I dare to say that it is my very right, since it can hardly affect anyone else, referring again to the lack of close-and-personal on the 'net, to verily be boorish. Such as being boorish can yield responses that tactful language might not.
I do thank you for using what I conveniently leave on every one of my posts - my email address. However, absent your identifying markings, I am posting this exchange on the roundtable that others can offer their opinions of my ways of postings. They can even get
ad hominem, as it suits their chance to opine on me and my posts, etc. So, I thank you for opening a topic for which I would be able to get a glimpse of me as a number of others do, as I appear on the roundtable.
Regards and blessings,
Warren Jewell
As a hackneyed expression would have it, 'fire when ready, Gridley' - whoever would be Gridley at-the-guns . . .
THIS IS
NOT an open invitation to 'hunt down' any but myself. None else has asked for such opinion of you. I ask for your frank appraisal - compare me to no one else except in vaguest identifiable terms about the other. Well - except as how his or her spiritual excellence to eloquence has trumped my less Godly posts. In that, there is lesson for any who read this thread, eh?
And, too, yet, however, do dare I to . . .
. . . remain your obedient servant, but God's first,
Pristinus Sapienter
(wljewell @catholicexchange.com or ... yahoo.com)