Yes, but -- he says he is talking about verbs and nouns and such, OS.
OFF WITH HIS HEAD!
...wonderful passage where 7-year-old Alice tells pompous Humpty-Dumpty that he really cannot make words mean whatever he likes.Hard to find a place for this response so I stretch the envelope here.
But Humpty was a mathematician; only Alice didn't grasp this.
Note
We let X denote the set of all fields having the universal set as a subset...
Or
Let X be the number of pies Jack can bake with help from Jill and Simple Simon...
See I can make them mean anything.
It's all in the axioms you see...
RE: "about verbs and nouns and such"No problem. Let G be the set of all verbs and let J be the set of all nouns. Now we can begin the discourse on G & J, or J & G if you would prefer.
You are so funny...
I cry "uncle" -- everything is math!
Now le't see your formual for the Holy Trinity, Smarty.
Let "I" be The Father
Let "A" be The Son
Let "M" be the Holy Spirit
The Union of "I", "A", and "M" is also the Intersection:
"I AM"
RE: "The Union of "I", "A", and "M" is also the Intersection:"Excellent. You are the star student today. Take a bow. It also has the advantage of being the self-consistent Truth which requires no bending by Humpty.
Aw...C'mon PS.
You, a man of faith (higher than the sciences), should recognize that mathematics is a language only of the created. By definition, it is limited. It can only do what it is supposed to do. And it does it as best as it can.
Kinda like us humans.
But it can still offer a brief, however small, glimmer to the great infinite and unknown.
RE: "union & intersection in the Trinity"Perhaps I took the proposition light-heartedly or as a metaphor. I can't help but have a nagging feeling that with a careful distinction or two, the illustration wouldn't be much worse than that of St. Pat & the clover.
You must log in to post.