Catholic Exchange Forums » Politics

Fanaticism

(37 posts)
  • Started 1 year ago by DonHudzinski
  • Latest reply from DonHudzinski

1 2
pouliot - Member
To: Need-A-Saint
RE: "...The fact he claims is because America is supporting Israel is the reason for Americas very reason for existence. This line of thinking is very protestant. Not Catholic. That was my point. *** Ever hear Bishop Sheen? He said in so few words that God created America to help other poor countries, to help do away with the radicals like Hitler, the Axist alliance, Communists or lets put it this way, Restrain them for a time, until they manifest their true nature...."
To me these seem like contrary assertions. 

In any case, the first assertion is intriguing enough by itself.  Do you think that because this is a Protestant idea (US exists for Israel's sake) that it cannot be true?

Regards,
Old Sigma (Cradle Catholic and amateur at almost all things attempted
Posted 1 year ago #
Protect the Rock - Moderator

Jesus said, "I will no longer talk much with you, for the ruler of this world is coming. He has no power over Me; but I do as the Father has commanded Me, so that the world may know that I love the Father. Rise, let us go hence."  (John 14:30-31)

The ruler of this world is, of course, the devil. 

Posted 1 year ago #
needasaint - Inactive

To: Need-A-Saint

RE: "...The fact he claims is because America is supporting Israel is the reason for Americas very reason for existence. This line of thinking is very protestant. Not Catholic.

That was my point.
***
Ever hear Bishop Sheen? He said in so few words that God created America to help other poor countries, to help do away with the radicals like Hitler, the Axist alliance, Communists or lets put it this way, Restrain them for a time, until they manifest their true nature...."

To me these seem like contrary assertions. 

In any case, the first assertion is intriguing enough by itself.  Do you think that because this is a Protestant idea (US exists for Israel's sake) that it cannot be true?

While it may or may not be true, thinking this way is incorrect and leads to errors biblically speaking.  That is not the Gospel. Nor does this country stand because of Israel. What about Japan? or South Korea? Or Cuba? Or Mexico? Africa? Other countries? If this is the case then these other countries would not benefit? Or is it because this country is an ally of Israel?  Ally's betray? So to be blunt, this thinking is biblically incorrect.  God says I will raise, Also God gives and God takes away.

The second point is God raises money to help the poor. That is the reason.   

Matthew 5 beattitudes, blessed are the poor in spirit for there's in the kingdom of heaven. Poor in spirit are living in poverty, persecuted, strangers, rejected, thrust out, abandoned, sick. 

Here's another contort for you:  Jesus says the poor you will always have with you but you will not always have me among you.  He was speaking to Judas about the woman pouring expensive alabaster oil and some ointment.

Third equation:  Lets look at countries that are in turmoil. Have they rejected God?

In this country we have christian roots that go way back to it's inception. What are we saying to them, the dead and gone, that they solely existed for the sole purpose of supporting and allying with Israel in the future? 

Here's another view:  God made this country, to make Israel jealous.  How can I say that? Well if you are familiar with the Old Testament, where in the Law was given that God had chosen Israel to feed other nations, that other nations would come to them for help, trade, protection, all things would flow from them that other nations needed or required.  To show there is a God and He had chosen Israel, but lets take a deeper look and say this that there is a God and all nations can come to God for help and nuturing.

Does this make any sense yet? 

All things point to God that is the bottom line. Getting caught in some thinking that gets one into errors that cause other truths to be shunted. 

Over night the enemy was out sewing seeds of discontentment.

 

 

Peace be with you.

Posted 1 year ago #
KenB - Member

Sorry for the repeat, but I think this (following) applies to this thread too.  In order to help reasonable, peace-loving Muslims stand up and beside us in this conflict, we need to give them reason to believe we are not the Godless hedonists the radical Muslims say we are. 

I voted for Bush both times, and while I think he is an honest man, and I do not regret voting for him, I think he is wrong on this.  I wish he had heeded the pope's advice before taking us into Iraq.  In any case, once he decided to go to war, I think he was wrong in how he chose to go about it.  He simply was not firm enough, and did not put enough men and material to the task.  We Americans will not go for a hundred-years war; this one has in my opinion dragged out long enough.

I prefer Pope Benedict's approach of trying to engage reasonable Muslims and if possible, find some way to steer clear of violence.

I think we need to be very firm and sadly, probably use a lot of violence against militant radical Muslim terrorists, but I do not think the whole of Iraq is composed of such radicals. 

Ultimately we need regular, garden variety, "reasonable" Muslims, both those at home and abroad, on our side.  However as long as even reasonable Muslims think we are a godless people with a vulgar, repugnant society who truly want to undermine their culture, family values, and disgrace their children with our decadent ways, it is doubtful many of them will come to our defense and risk getting on board with our plans to help build a democratic society in Iraq. 

I mean, we can build as many schools and hospitals as we like, and we can even get the water & electric running, but as long as regular (i.e. traditional, but non-radical) Muslims honestly believe we are part of a Godless society that they both fear and loathe, we will not win.

I have read where even radical Muslims are not so much against democracy (witness the elections in Palestine, where the radical Hamas group actually won the election), as they are appalled at what we Amercians have decided to do with our freedoms.  Don't misunderstand me; bin Laden is not a democrat.  However the way they see it, rather than use our freedoms to advance things civilized, Godly, and gentle, the image we put out to the world is that we have chosen the way of abortion, gay marriage, free love, drugs, and a host of other decadent things that have lead to a society plagued with violence, mental and physical illness, a high divorce rate, a real drug problem, troubled, scandalized, or very cynical children, and the like.

While of course we need to fight radical Muslims terrorists (and we need to be serious about them, by the way), we also should take a look at ourselves.  At the very least we should examine the image we put out to the rest of the world. 

The cultural trash we routinely broadcast to the world by way of movies, TV, music and the arts are quite offensive to traditional cultures, but when for example, American NGO groups like Planned Parenthood or any number of gay pride or other types of atheistic, secular humanist groups internationally promote (via UN or other means) abortion, sexual liberties, and/or other types of anti-family, anti-religious policies and generally low morals, given our status as a superpower, of course traditional patriarchal and/or religious societies will find that (i.e., us) threatening.  These things offend and threaten many of the traditional societies in this world.  In particular, they have driven the radical Muslim fringe of traditional Muslim societies into a violent rage against us. 

We would do well then, and it is in our best interest, to be aware of and sensitive to how other societies see us.  In short, we should try to put our best foot forward internationally, and try not broadcast things to these traditional cultures that we know will disgust and horrify them.  

Reasonable conservatives in the US and reasonable Muslims (not fanatical mind you, but reasonable Muslims) both here and abroad, should try to see those things that - culturally - we in fact have in common (e.g., pro-life, respect for modesty, belief in traditional social values, etc.) and in the process, perhaps even develop some sort of mutual respect.

KB

Posted 1 year ago #
needasaint - Inactive

I do not believe violence is the correct measure to be taken.  Our Faith forbids this, because Jesus did no violence.  He went to the Skull, carrying His Cross.  This has several illustrations we can use for our everyday life, our own individual issues. 

He was True Man:  In Lent we focus on His 40 days of fasting and preparing for His Mission.  He slept in a cave, rocks were His comfort.  He ate nothing nor drank nothing for 40 days.  He denied the flesh in order to be one with the Father.  He felt all the pains and sufferings and lived them. Then after the fasting while being totally emaciated and exhausted, the devil appears to Him to tempt Him, to bring Him to the point of abusing His Messaiah, Redeemer, where He rules with Iron(King)

[ Jesus came as Messaiah, Redeemer the First Time.  The Second time He comes as King, Fully God ]

As man Jesus came to show us that man can achieve power over the flesh.  What was the First Adam?  He was Pure and Holy.  After the Fall Adam became an animal losing his spirituality. Lowered himself to that of an animal. Angels are spirits, God is a Spirit, Man was Gods perfection in creation. This being a Soul with Flesh and Blood like an animal.  Among all the beasts in the field only Man stands upright and has a soul, that animals may know Man is king among this world.  But that went by the wayside and Satan took over mens hearts through the seduction of a woman.  God created Adam and Eve, man and woman to love each other endlessly and to have rule over not only his animal nature, his animal kingdom as well.  The Soul, in man, is an Image of God.  God told the animals to obey the upright animal who has a soul, because in obeying my Image in this animal you obey Me.

So now Satan has mens hearts and it is a struggle to pull them away from, sensuality, pride, avarice.  Man without the knowledge of God in his own heart, goes the way of these three branches Sensuality, Pride and Avarice.  The root being self worship, being made a lesser God. 

Now if we who are called according to His Grace go the route of violence we make God a liar, for God is Love.  James says there is only one Judge who is able to destroy and to deliver.  We cannot make this ascertion to deliver judgement such as this. What you are saying is an eye for an eye, tooth fo r tooth, this is what the radicals teach.  You are falling pray to the tempter who has beguiled you to such and lowered yourself to their nature.  Our True nature is of the Second Adam who gave into no such things.  But instead humbled himself to the death of a Cross.

 

James 

4:12 There is one lawgiver, and judge, that is able to destroy and to deliver.

5:9 Grudge not, brethren, one against another, that you may not be judged. Behold the judge standeth before the door.

5:10 Take, my brethren, for an example of suffering evil, of labour and patience, the prophets, who spoke in the name of the Lord.

Let me now add to verse 10, take for example our bretheren, James, Peter, John, Paul, and Jesus, etc...

 

Peace be with you

Posted 1 year ago #
fishman - Member
I have to chime in in support of need a saint here. I think he has two really good points , but perhapses I can re-articulate them in a manor more understandable to some. When it comes to the support of Israel. The decision on weather or not we should support them MUST be based on weather or not it is the will of God that we do so. If it is not his will and we do support him we will bring down judgment on ourselves. If it is he will and do support them , we can be satisfied that we have loved God, but should not expect any reward. The creator will try us or reward us as according to if we follow his will, not whom we do or do not support. Predicating our actions on a EXTREMELY literal interpretation of a SMALL part of scripture is very well in the vain of fundamentalism ( which is a condemned heresy in the catholic church) and rightly unrecognized and protestant in nature and against the spirit of God ( uncatholic) . Why is that? because God inspired the WHOLE scripture and only when it is understood as a whole have you listened to the spirit. Our support or resistance to individuals or nations should be based on what they do , not the title they carry.
Posted 1 year ago #
fishman - Member
To try and more directly address the thread? The thread asked, should we be reaching out to reasonable muslins, especially in light of the recent actions of the pope. Of coarse we should, and reasonable Buddhists and reasonable pagans of all sorts and kinds. We need to keep in mind however that 'sanity' rightly defined means correct understanding of reality , which includes God. so even a reasonable Muslim is not a particularly sane person, because they worship what they do not understand. What we really mean by 'reasonable' is those willing to listen to and attempt to move towards the truth. That is exactly what Christ did, that is exactly what the pope did, that is exactly what everyone should do always. Try to lead people to the truth. It helps if we first stop fighting and trying to kill people. It is impossible to show someone the love of Christ when you are trying to kill them or they are trying to kill you. So what is the best way to put an end to the 'muslim threat' build up the church, by living the truth. Put first things first. Focus on being holy , because God will do the rest. Let him use you / us/ this nation for his own ends by focusing first on his will. Everything else is secondary, and should not be a cause for us to lose our peace. How do we defeat the Muslim threat to peace, if each citizen in the united states was 1 10th as holy as JPII or francis of Assisi or John of the cross we would be well on our way. Why aren't we all as holy or holier the mother Teresa? Or St. Padre Pio? or St. Maxmillian kolbe? in the end the answer is because we don't WANT to be. and as much as we don't WANT to be that much too we do not WANT world piece or and end to the thread of islam. Because against holiness evil is always dissolved like smoke. So need a saint is right, where should your attention be focused? on world politics? on the newspaper? on the muslims? No FIRST focus on Jesus and the Eucharist and through the direction of the holy spirit be lead to what is right and wrong. Scripture puts it this way: "Seek ye first the kingdom of God and all else will follow"
Posted 1 year ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.

Donate

Welcome to our redesigned site. Your continued support will make further improvements possible. Please click here to donate.

CE Spotlight

Faith Factory

Champions of Faith Ad

Radio & Podcasts


Rock Solid with Mark Shea: April 14, 2008 - Confirmation: Piety and Knowledge