Less than a month, and one more bogus slanted debate, to go, folks –
Can we reflect, now, too, on the results of the use of purported ‘racism’ in this election? We find virtually every criticism being called racist by both the One’s campaign and their moron MSM (as in, increasingly, 'MMSM') surrogates. It seems to matter nothing that no such promulgation has occurred on the part of the other campaign, that they have taken pains to give ‘race’ no airing. Nor does it seem to matter that if the One were a (CINO) Catholic-converted WASP I wouldn’t (CANNOT) vote for him for dog catcher. His record, such as it is in the prevalence of ‘present’ votes is 1. absorbed into the culture of death and 2. socialist tending toward Marxist.
Hmmm – can this emotion-driving, phony ‘racism’ mark whatever candidate who wins for assassination attempts by various deluded parties?
Some high-profile types have already maintained that ANY vote against the One must per se be racist. And, therefore, as the threatening noise goes, that some violence (’revolution’?!) may reign.
But, too, such talk can lead certain other types to look around, smirk and remark such untoward rhetoric as: “WELL! If I am a racist, don’t I have to find the [fill-in-the-slur] about which I am racist?”
I do worry about this, as well, because my daughter and her family, and I myself, live in a community where we are the minority; and, not a very large proportion of ‘minority’ at that. Any defensive suggestions, besides moving or running from car to house, and the like?


